Secure Transfer System »     Client Portal Access »

Posts in the ‘Coding and Compliance’ Category

The Many Ways of Being Newsworthy

Posted by Paul Spencer, CPC, CPC-H in Coding and Compliance, Electronic Health Records, In the Press, Paul Spencer CPC CPC-H

As I begin this post, it’s been a typical Friday. My 4-year-old son took an interminably long time getting dressed this morning, I showered, shaved, ate breakfast and my picture ended up on the front page of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel….

OK, so one of those things is atypical. I’ll give you a hint: I usually eat breakfast.

For more information on my 14th minute and 58th second of fame in my lifetime, click here (I’m the guy with the orange guitar). The story accompanying my grainy image is self-explanatory. So as not to worry readers who may not click through about the reasons for appearing in the newspaper, it doesn’t involve an indictment, a drunken man running onto a baseball field or (surprisingly, to those who know me) a vicious automobile accident. In these troubled and trying times, it’s nice to be part of a good story for a change, and I’m looking forward to tomorrow’s events as described in the article.

So now that we all know what a happy story looks like, let’s explore the flip side as it applies to health care compliance. I came across a story out of Florida that is a good case in point. A couple from a town called Land O’ Lakes (like you, I immediately thought of butter) were making their Sunday run to their local recycling center. When they got there, they found that there was no room for their paper items in the designated dumpster at the center. This was because someone had filled the paper bin to capacity with discarded medical records. In some cases, the records included Social Security, credit card and driver’s license numbers in addition to medical information.  

The first thing I thought of with this story was regarding EHR, and how stories like this may become obsolete within five years. Then I begin to think the opposite, with the personal theory that as practices transition from a paper record to an electronic record, we may see instances like this more often thanks to record destruction companies attempting to cut corners.

Then I begin to daydream, first about dancing in rain made of Newcastle Brown Ale to the music of the Who, then shaking my head and quickly transitioning to the government’s recent re-dedication to recovering money lost from Medicare and Medicaid due to fraud.

Having been involved with coding and compliance for several years, I’ve learned that there really is no end to to the devious machinations of the ethically-challenged in our business. From podiatrists who bill foot care on patients who have had previous foot amputations to DME suppliers forcing unneeded power mobility devices on the local population of elderly residents, extending to the virus of identity theft currently infecting  some medical practices, you need a chain saw to cut through the levels of immoral behavior in this industry.

The damage that these assorted criminals inflict is not restricted to the CMS trust funds. Medical providers who spend their waking hours operating by the rules inadvertently find themselves in the outer remnants of the spotlight that shines on the crooks. The doctors acting above board and rendering legitimate services ultimately pay a high price for the actions of the bad seeds in increased regulation, investigation and bad public relations for the health care industry as a whole.

The current administration has doubled down on recovery of overpayments through fraud and abuse investigations. For the future of Medicare and Medicaid, I see this as overdue. There are many ways to make the news, but perhaps the best approach for the honest medical provider is to implement and follow policies that insure that you end up in the non-”perp walk” portions of the local news.

Of Pay Fixes and Whistleblowers

Posted by Paul Spencer, CPC, CPC-H in Coding and Compliance, Hot Topics, Paul Spencer CPC CPC-H

It has now been roughly 37 hours since I returned home from a vacation in Austin, TX.

A vacation is not usually a time of positive personal accomplishment. From this particular respite, I can say that the only net gains in my column were 4 1/2 pounds of buffet weight, the free beer I had bestowed upon me in an Irish bar on 6th Street from a friendly couple who enjoyed my musical interlude (thank you again, kind strangers) and the bodies of dead bugs from seven different states that now decorate my windshield in all of their Jackson Pollock-esque splendor.

When it comes to a permanent fix to the Sustainable Growth Rate formula (SGR) for Medicare payments, the U. S. Congress accomplished little more than I did during the same period of time.

Currently, there is a plan being floated by the Democrats in the House of Representatives that would delay a permanent fix to SGR until 2015. The plan would provide pay increases for a four-year period. This legislation would again need to advance prior to the latest deadline of June 1, 2010 to avoid the oft-delayed 21.3% cut that was set to originally take place at the beginning of this calendar year.

As with all past temporary fixes that have taken place, this legislation has the effect of kicking the larger problem down the road and feeding the vulture that is the pay cut, which by some estimates could be as high as 37% when 2015 rolls around.

Looking at the calendar, we are again faced with five working days to attend to the latest temporary fix before Congress takes a one-week recess for Memorial Day. This recess is expected to be spent knee-deep in the process of campaigning in an election year. If I had to make a prediction, I would begin to get comfortable with the idea of another CMS-induced delay of 10 business days for claims processing beginning on June 1st until either the legislation above or a different package offering a stay of execution of the current planned pay cut is implemented.

Also greeting me upon my return was another bit of news regarding a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine. The study was conducted jointly by scholars at Harvard Medical School and Tufts University School of Medicine among others, and focused on the effects felt by insiders who decide to file qui tam, or “whistleblower” lawsuits in the pharmaceutical industry. Despite the fact that $9 billion had been recovered due to qui tam lawsuits between 1996 and 2005, the study concluded that there is a high personal and professional toll felt by those who file qui tam lawsuits against their employer.

Twenty-six informants were interviewed for the study, which in addition to the above, led to a variety of findings:

  • 82% were subjected to firing, intimidation or blackballing upon filing the lawsuit;
  • The filing of lawsuits in most cases is precipitated by a job change, such as a promotion or other career change that makes the person privy to inside information about company operations;
  • Most of the whistleblowers attempted in vain to find an internal remedy to the unethical behavior, but were either ignored, dismissed or given orders to continue the behavior unabated.

 

What jumped out at me was that last bullet. With 90% of fraud suits starting with the qui tam process, I find it amazing that after years of awareness of the consequences of non-compliance, the primary reaction of companies whose policies are questioned from the inside tends not to be “OK, let’s investigate and if necessary, fix this”, but instead defaults to “Don’t rock the boat”.

The study recommended several steps to improve the qui tam process, including better employee protections against retaliation, increased resources for the U. S. Justice Department for enforcement (over 1,000 qui tam cases are pending currently with the department) and rewards for insiders that are equitable based on the dollar amount of the fraud that is uncovered.

The co-authors also recommended that policymakers try to instill an ethical sense that encourages more people to come forward. While that is a noble endeavor, it is also up to the companies themselves to operate in an environment of ethics and integrity that encourages the solving of problems as they arise, rather than the time-honored tradition of sweeping the problem under the rug in hopes that problems disappear permanently. 

To put it another way based on recent personal experience, if you’re driving the same road without windshield washer fluid and the bugs are continually hitting your windshield, there will come a time when you can’t see where you’re going and you lose direction.

Avoiding The Hidden Dangers of Compliance

Posted by Paul Spencer, CPC, CPC-H in Coding and Compliance, Paul Spencer CPC CPC-H

I come to you a day early this week at the beginnings of a vacation.

My one-week break (save for this space) started with an interesting occurrence in my neighborhood. As my family and I were sitting down to dinner last night, we saw flashing lights coming in from our front window. These lights were the beginnings of what turned out to be a gathering of four fire engines, one fire SUV (the chief drives stag), two police cars and –  one interesting addition to the vehicular melee - an animal control van.  It seems that a house across the street from my own in Milwaukee was discovered to contain a bevy of unattended exotic wild animals, including 5 anacondas ranging in length from 20 to 30 feet.

I am very much a man with concrete in my soul. Due to a contented life of urbanization, annoying allergies and a pathological fear of bugs, I’ve always preferred city life. Say the word “camping” to me and I instantly think of a room on the bottom floor of the hotel. Early yesterday, the list of pluses for city living also included the words “….and no tropical snakes!” at the bottom of it. I guess we can scratch that off now. I used to get a good laugh at the local news’ “man-in-the-street” interviews with stories like this. It’s not so rib-tickling when those sudden TV personalities are your neighbors talking about another person in your neighborhood who decided on his own to start an unsupervised Brazilian zoo in the middle of your block.

Yesterday’s improvised neighborhood reptile round-up was yet another reminder that the world is full of hidden dangers. As my mind races at the thought of what happens the next time I stand in the shower with the water running thanks to my neighbor’s keen interest in herpetology, I also spare a thought to the hidden dangers in the world of medical billing, specifically as it relates to compliance and government audits.

I try to explain it to the laymen in the following fashion: every bit of information that goes out on a typical health claim to an insurance carrier has the potential not only for denial, but for larger compliance problems down the road. Try this exercise: find a blank CMS-1500 form some time and start from Box 1 in the upper left hand corner and work your way down all the way to Box 33b in the lower right. In each box, identify a reason for that box as to why a claim would be denied by an insurance company. Depending on the payer, the reason for the claim, the services being claimed, and a host of other factors, an experienced biller or coder should be able to identify errors that could occur with at least 20 fields that could potentially lead to a claim denial. These could be as simple as “Date of birth entered incorrectly” to “CLIA waiver number not included in Box 23 for a governmental payer”

The compliance view doesn’t stop there. The last question that should be asked before a claim is prepared for billing should always be “Do the services reported on this claim best represent what is documented in the patient’s medical record?”. If there is any question whatsoever of the answer being a firm “Yes!”, It’s best to give the claim a second look.

With some regulatory teeth provided by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the compliance landscape for providers of all specialties is about to morph into something more intense than we ever could have imagined just 10 years ago. Five years from today, more sets of eyes will be looking at medical claims than ever before, thanks to an alphabet soup of regulatory agencies both currently in existence and still on the drawing board. Now is more than past the time to internalize the idea that the contents of every claim, much like the house full of serpents down the block, is something that should be taken very seriously.

Avoiding “The Tempest” of Investigation

Posted by Paul Spencer, CPC, CPC-H in Coding and Compliance, Hot Topics, Industry Updates, Paul Spencer CPC CPC-H

394 years ago today, William Shakespeare, the man whose works continue to be the high points of narrative drama written in the English language, died in his home in Stratford-on-Avon just a few days before his 52nd birthday.

I have a sense of humor that leans heavily to the dark side, so when I think of favorite scenes from Shakespeare’s plays, my favorite among all of his scenes is towards the end of Julius Caesar, when the angry mob surrounds, attacks and kills Cinna the Poet in a case of mistaken identity with one of Caesar’s assassins who shares his name. I can imagine the Monty Python comedy troupe having a field day with this scene on a strictly absurdist level.  

There may be nothing worse in this world on an individual human level than being accused of something you simply didn’t do and feeling as if you have absolutely no recourse to defend yourself except to exclaim your innocence.  With this thought in mind, I find this to be a perfect opportunity to speak to the physician community about CMS’ expanded audit guidelines that are part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).

I made a passing mention in a previous post about the expansion of recovery audit contractors (RAC’s) to the state level for Medicaid plans, in addition to expanding the focus of audit for the four national RAC’s already in place. It is important to internalize what this means on the individual physician level, namely that there are more sets of eyes on your practice than ever before.

While the worst of those committing fraud against the Medicare program or other insurances tend to rise to the top and get skimmed off quickly, it is my belief that the majority of physicians believe strongly that the services for which they are billing are commensurate with the actual services performed on behalf of the patient. Yet all the belief in the world will not help you if the documentation prepared in support of those billed services is lacking.

I’ve spoken before about the importance of reviewing documentation for E/M services. Perhaps it is also a good time to look at the documentation of the procedures you perform, both within the office and in other locations. Are your notes a complete picture of the procedure performed from beginning to end? If the procedure is so extensive as to require an assistant at surgery, does the operative report include documentation of the necessity of the assistant? Is the documentation signed, keeping in mind that any op report can be rejected due to a lack of signature under CMS’ new signature requirements? If the procedure note is handwritten, is it legible?

The same thing applies to medical tests and diagnostic services. Does the documentation currently in the patient’s file represent a 1:1 comparison with the services billed? If you are billing for interpretation and reporting, is your report documented?

When physicians hear the word “fraud”, a defense mechanism is usually triggered from their perspective that believes with every fiber of their being, much like Cinna the Poet, they are being accused of something they didn’t do. If you performed a service, fully document that service and go forward secure in the knowledge that you have evidence of every service performed on behalf of your patients and their welfare.

As delicately as I can, I’ll explain it to you this way: Cinna the Poet lacked documentation of who he was and what he did. How did that work out?

The Long Overdue CMS Signature Requirements

Posted by Paul Spencer, CPC, CPC-H in Coding and Compliance, Paul Spencer CPC CPC-H

In the 43 years and roughly 11 months that I’ve walked the planet, there have been a number of hoaxes that have been identified after careful study. From Clifford Irving’s “autobiography” of Howard Hughes to the Tassadai Tribe to the Hitler diaries to Balloon Boy, there is no shortage of things in our culture that appear authentic on first blush that turn out to be nothing more than elaborate inventions.

Being a natural cynic and skeptic, when these frauds rear their head, I begin to expand the thought model and wonder about accepted interpretations of long-standing monuments of human existence. What if Stonehenge was just some crazy person’s attempt at modern housing gone terribly wrong? What if the Inca roads were actually an ancient horse race track? What if the Egyptian hieroglyphics that have been interpreted by historians as blessings to the god Ra actually translate to “Thursday: Ate eggs. Worshipped the cat. It was hot again in the desert”.

As a medical chart auditor, when confronted with the average physician’s handwriting, it is easy to fall back into this pattern of thought. Thankfully, I also carry with me the curse of horrible penmanship, so I’m uniquely suited to look at handwritten physician documentation. Sadly, as of yesterday, that skill set may not be enough.

Beginning March 18th, CMS brought forth signature requirements for physician documentation that are much more stringent than in the past. These rules stemmed partially from a sudden sharp increase in the Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) error rate in 2009, with missing or illegible signatures on medical record documentation being one of the main drivers of the error rate spike.  

Aside from a mass reintroduction of the Palmer Method to the physician community, there are definitive ways to get the physician signature recognized as legitimate on documentation.

Let’s begin with the premise that the physician has an illegible signature. If the physician utilizes a record that is pre-printed with his or her full name and credentials, identifying the physician of record can be as easy as circling the physician’s name on the record and providing a signature on the same page. If the provider provides an illegible signature over his or her typed or printed name, this is also acceptable. In the absence of records pre-printed with the physician’s name, the last method of identifying an illegible physician signature is through the use of a signature log, which would contain the provider’s printed name and credentials along with the physician’s signature.

A legible signature can take the form of either the full first and last name of the physician, or the physician’s first initial and full last name. It is not recommended that an initial be used in place of the physician’s last name unless the physician’s name is pre-printed on the medical record or is accompanied by a signature log, as in the examples above.

If the physician neglects to sign a portion of a handwritten note, but the note page contains other entries in the same handwriting that are signed, the documentation is considered acceptable.

A signature stamp, or the words “Signature on File” without a corresponding physician signature are not considered acceptable documentation of the physician’s signature.

While the annals of history have provided us with multiple interpretations of the same landmarks or events, audits of physician documentation by CMS and their contracted entities are not nearly as open-minded or forgiving. While many interpretations can be reasonably argued, a lack of a signature that clearly identifies the physician of record presents an unnecessary risk of a negative audit finding to a physician. Following the steps outlined above offer the shortest root to the beginnings of a defensible medical record.

Embracing Reimbursement Opportunities in Lean Times

Posted by Paul Spencer, CPC, CPC-H in Coding and Compliance, Paul Spencer CPC CPC-H

There is evidence to suggest that the first week of March is the unkindest time of year for funny fat guys. Lou Costello and William Frawley (from “I Love Lucy”) died on March 3rd, John Candy died on March 4th and John Belushi died on March 5th. If I didn’t have enough incentive to start losing weight, a look at this list during the past week would have been all I needed to move forward, as this would appear to be an unfriendly time for those with excess weight.

Historical patterns also suggest that all empires and times of excess eventually come to an abrupt end. We tend to mark the ages of man by the main national force of the time frame, chronicling the times of lapsed cultural powers, from Ancient Egypt to Greece to Rome. The modern advantage we all share is the ability to review history and learn from it. When we embrace the lessons learned, humanity has the ability to come out on the other side of lean times stronger than ever before.

Our country currently finds itself in a profound time of economic challenge, which threatens the stability of long-established institutions. With the U6 unemployment rate (which measures total unemployed, underemployed and long-term unemployed only marginally attached to the workforce) currently measuring at 17.9%, effects begin to move through parts of our economy at different rates. There is a feeling in our industry that the economy has unceremoniously arrived at the door of the healthcare delivery system. Combine our current economic morass with the double-digit premium increases foisted upon those who still have coverage from the health insurance sector (none of which is returned to healthcare providers in the form of more favorable contract terms) and it becomes of paramount importance to look for unexplored ways to increase collections.

There is a direct correlation between the reduction of workers and the increase in the self-pay population presenting for healthcare services. This burgeoning population requires increased due diligence on the part of registration and front-desk staff to minimize the impact of this group on a provider’s bottom line. The following simple steps can assure that providers protect themselves and retain full value for their services:

  • Insurance Demographic Verification – When an established patient either presents for services or contacts you for an appointment for future services, verify that the patient’s coverage is still in force. This will give both parties a clear picture of the patient’s liability for services rendered.
  • Know Your Fees – The self-pay population, particularly a provider’s established patients, will want to know their liability for services. Having your fees for certain services on hand will help front-end staff in designing a payment schedule for the patient.
  • Compliance Awareness – Routine blanket waivers of co-payments, deductible and coinsurance are considered a violation of federal law if you see Medicare or Medicaid patients in your practice. Federal law does allow for economic relief for a patient due to financial hardship. In each case where a patient requests forgiveness of all or a portion of their outstanding balance, economic information unique to that patient should be taken into account before arriving at a dollar amount.
  • Know Your Referral Rules – Specialists must be acutely aware of referral and prior authorization rules and requirements for insurances utilized in their area. Without this knowledge, the number of non-covered services for patients with active insurance coverage needlessly increases, often with no opportunity for appeal. There are some carriers that will allow for retro-authorization, but this is not such a large number that a provider should gamble with reimbursement of legitimate services.

 

Thin times often call for defensive measures. With the understanding that each provider’s field of practice offers with it unique considerations, internalizing and following the above steps can provide a healthy head start towards seeing a practice from current lean times to (hopefully) brighter and heavier days ahead.

A New World Coming Monday!

Posted by Paul Spencer, CPC, CPC-H in Coding and Compliance, Hot Topics, Industry Updates, Paul Spencer CPC CPC-H

UPDATE (2/26/2010, 4:23 PM EST): Since my creation of the following post this morning, it has been learned that the Senate has adjourned for the weekend and will not be passing the temporary reduction freeze in time for the Monday deadline.   

The latest temporary measure was to be attached to another measure granting an extension of unemployment benefits for 12 million people whose benefits have run out. Jim Bunning, the senior senator from Kentucky currently in his final term, filibustered the bill based on the bill either not having equal cuts in spending to pay for itself or because the funds for the bills would not come from leftover money from an earlier stimulus package. The Democratic majority was unable and/or unwilling to break the filibuster, and the Senate has now adjourned until Monday. 

CMS has since issued a press release that states that they are instructing the MAC’s to place a hold on claims for the first 10 business days in March. It is believed that this will provide ample time for Congress to issue another temporary payment fix.  

It was 104 years ago today that my grandmother was born in the western suburbs of Philadelphia. Some of the only positive memories I hold of my childhood stem from the time I spent with my grandmother in her kitchen. She had a breakfast table in her kitchen that looked out upon her back yard. Just beyond her backyard was the Route 100 line, that sent trolley cars from 69th Street in Philadelphia to their final destination to the west, in Norristown, with many stops in between. It was easy to get lost in the great potential the world offers a small child standing in her backyard on a sunny day, with the subtlest hint of clouds in the sky and the clickety-clack of the trolley passing every 15 minutes. 

My grandmother left this world in April of 1994, In the nearly 16 years since, the memories I’ve carried with me of the time I spent by her side reappear at strange times. It could be the sound of a distant train or the smell of her veal recipe that I still make for my wife and son from time to time. Yet when her memory comes forward, after remembering a funny story or a brief glimmer of a moment in past time when the two of us occupied the same space, the very last thing I feel when such memories arise is loss, and the change in my life that losing this one person brought forward. One can only dance inside their head for an instant before the reality of subtraction appears before them. 

Which brings me to today’s urgent topic. Over the past 6 weeks, the medical community has watched with a combination of anger and exhaustion as Congress has failed to definitively act on the issue of the 21.3% decrease in Medicare payments set to take effect this coming Monday. As I type this, yet another piece of legislation has been introduced to delay the pay cut until March 28th, which would create yet another window of opportunity to create a permanent solution to this annual occurrence. 

As I described in an earlier post on this topic, we have become desensitized to this process, as a white knight with long flowing hair, cleverly disguised as the latest legislative stay of execution, has until now always arrived in the twilight moments of the latest deadline. With the two days between now and March 1st falling on a weekend, the possibility exists that perhaps this is the time when the knight has either fallen asleep or found other worlds to save. 

While it is certainly within the realm of possibility based on past precedent that a temporary pay fix will pass before the Monday deadline, the sobering reality still exists that no fix may be coming. A question immediately appears in my head, wondering how many physicians have truly prepared themselves for this darker eventuality. If someone in this industry takes a moment to imagine the medical delivery landscape in a world where 21% of the largest payer’s receivables suddenly disappear like water vapor, it is more than likely a post-apocalyptic vision. 

Lou Reed, with a mix of poetry and a New Yorker’s gift for blunt assessment, once wrote “There’s a bit of magic in everything/and then some loss to even things out”.  The healthcare system now finds itself facing an unwelcome loss, while once again hoping for the annual act of prestidigitation that makes a pay cut disappear right in front of your eyes. While those of us involved in the industry can do all we can in the next few days by inundating Congress with faxes and telephone calls demanding a remedy to this situation, be mindful of what this change actually means to our system. Without that awareness, the reimbursement realities of today could become the memories and sense of loss of Monday.

The Palmetto Horror Picture Show Continues

Posted by Paul Spencer, CPC, CPC-H in Coding and Compliance, Hot Topics, Industry Updates, Paul Spencer CPC CPC-H

In my spare time, I’m a sucker for black and white slapstick comedy. If challenged, I could probably recite every line and verbally recreate every scene from the Marx Brothers’ 1933 comedy classic Duck Soup, complete with Harpo’s pantomimes and horn honks. I also do a mean imitation of Curly Howard of the Three Stooges running on his side if prodded, just not right now.

What makes slapstick comedy gratifying is the belief that it exists strictly in the realm of entertainment. In real life, we tend not to see pie fights at society parties, wars won because the leader of the enemy country is being pelted into submission with fruit or adults getting hit square in the face while playing dodgeball. We tend to think that institutions can’t descend into complete and utter chaos due to one bad decision, yet the process looks really easy to accomplish with the right script, the right actors and a skill for setting up a humorous situation.

In the absence of an abundance of banana peals and squirt bottles full of seltzer water, the closest parallel we have to slapstick comedy in our daily lives is the decision-making process of our federal government, particularly in relation to its unctuous administrative giveaways to large American businesses. As an illustrative example, I present Palmetto GBA, which in the past two years has quickly risen to the top of the list as a California physician’s least favorite wholly owned subsidiary of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of South Carolina.

During the last presidential administration, someone in government decided that it would be a wonderful idea to take the assignment of Medicare contractors for some states and shift them to other contractors. As part of that decision, Palmetto GBA, who until 2008 had been responsible for some of the smaller states in this country, was given oversight of the state of California, which by itself is the 7th largest economy in the world. Simultaneously, the decision was made to move every provider to a National Provider Identifier (NPI). 

What was planned was a smooth transition from one carrier to another with an accompanying, long-awaited transition to a single provider ID number. What resulted in mid-2008 was comparable to Lucy and Ethel at the candy factory, with too little staff assigned to too big a task. This would be the perfect situation for high comedy were it not for the fact that it sent tens of thousands of medical practices in America’s largest state to the brink of bankruptcy due to long-delayed NPI enrollment applications and lack of staff to answer basic questions leading to resolution.

In the fall of 2008, a flurry of press releases emanated from Palmetto GBA in typical corporate style stating that the problems were being addressed, additional staff was being added post-transition and that everything was going to suddenly metamorphose into a fantasy land of fairies, elves, candy buttons, marshmallow clouds and rivers of pure chocolate.  In the roughly 18 months since, it can be successfully argued that the same problems still exist, only instead of NPI, Palmetto GBA has now demonstrated their lack of readiness a second time with their approach to the PECOS/referring physician database issue.

As an illustrative example, one of our California providers, was having a problem with his Provider Transaction Account Number (PTAN). When our credentialing specialist contacted Palmetto GBA, the person answering the phone stated that the physician did not have an individual PTAN. It was shortly after this that the physician received a letter stating that the same supposedly non-existing individual PTAN was being deactivated. Further investigation revealed that this stemmed from a suite number in the correspondence address being entered incorrectly in Palmetto’s system, which in turn caused a conflict with the PECOS system, hence the threatened deactivation.

Mercifully, CMS has now delayed Phase II of the PECOS project until January 3, 2011, which gives Palmetto GBA roughly 10 months to discover another integral process for which they lack either competent staff or updated information. The lesson of California’s painful transition is still playing out, as the last 14 states in the five jurisdictions yet to go through administrative carrier transition are being delayed due to protests being lodged with CMS. This affects the four additional states that will be under Palmetto GBA after final transition. Spare a little pity for the provider communities in the Carolinas, Virginia and West Virginia after all is said and done.

All of this provides an abject lesson in governmental process. It is hoped in the future that legislative changes with profound financial side effects will more resemble a workable, functional business model rather than a 3-dimensional tribute to Larry, Moe and Curly.

Quick Updates Typed Between Coughs

Posted by Paul Spencer, CPC, CPC-H in Coding and Compliance, Hot Topics, Industry Updates, Paul Spencer CPC CPC-H

Chalk this posting up to exhaustion.

It turns out that the annoying cough I’ve been fighting for the last week is actually bronchitis. For this, my urgent care physician prescribed a Z-Pack and $50 cough syrup that makes you drowsy. To spare the reader, I skipped the cough syrup for this post, as it’s a fine line between an industry blog posting and William Burroughs’ Naked Lunch. I’ll be brief, and hopefully effective.

Two updates of note came to light this week. First, on January 4th, Medicare was to implement a rule clarifying date of service and place of service rules for interpretation of diagnostic tests. These rules stated that the date of service and place of service of the interpretation of diagnostic tests should be when and where the interpretation was performed, and not the date and place of the performance of the test. Thankfully, on February 5th, this new rule was postponed indefinitely due to mass provider confusion. The policy could be reviewed at a later date for future implementation.

The second update follows up on my last posting here regarding the 2010 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. Thanks to the snowstorms that pounded the East Coast this week, which led to a federal government

Who’s Minding The Store?

Posted by Paul Spencer, CPC, CPC-H in Coding and Compliance, Hot Topics, Industry Updates, Paul Spencer CPC CPC-H

Being a person who renders opinion and advice regarding medical billing and coding issues, I have done my level best in this space to remain neutral as the political infighting continues in our nation’s capital with regard to health care reform in general, and physician reimbursement specifically. A glance at the calendar is changing my mind.

Today is February 5th, and being that this is the shortest month of the year (think of February as Tattoo and the calendar as Fantasy Island), I count that there are 23 days left until Medicare will begin instituting a 21.3% pay cut across the board for all physicians. Seeing as a cut of this magnitude immediately places countless medical providers is dire straits, and by extension our clinic-based medical infrastructure in jeopardy, one would think that this issue would be at the top of the list for a country that embraced “promote the general welfare” as a founding ideal of the nation. So it is with surprise that upon looking at the Congressional calendar for February that Congress is giving themselves a break for the entire week beginning February 15th. This drops the actual days to fix the problem to roughly 18, but anyone who has ever tortured themselves watching C-SPAN can tell you, U. S. Congressional work must be judged on quality of time spent, and not quantity.

Physicians are already taking a financial hit in 2010 with the Medicare’s elimination of reimbursement for consultation codes. As specialty organizations urgently lobby their members to contact Congress to issue a fix, Congress is snapping into action by taking 5 days off.

I spend my work days being a physician advocate. While it is not the place in life that I pictured for myself in my childhood, I think of myself as a very important part of our healthcare system as it is currently configured. Physicians spend 10+ years being trained to solve the myriad issues involved with the inner workings of the human body. We don’t contact a physician when we’re feeling great. A doctor is called when something is wrong. I object to this being  referred to as “A God complex” as so many do, as this is not a preordained royal imprimatur, but rather an outcropping of the decade or more of training necessary to understand and positively restore human beings to maximum function. I feel I owe it to a physician to take financial worries off the table and let them concentrate on what they have been trained to do.

I had five doctors in my family ranging across four different medical specialties. I find the scientific healing of the sick to be a fascinating world, not only for what is known about the human body, but what remains unknown as well. Had I been a better student (a FAR better student), it’s very possible that I could have ended up on the clinical side of health care rather than the administrative. As it is, my mind is geared more for appreciation of physicians rather than the occupation itself. Having said that, with the current insurance landscape, the work I and others on this side of the healthcare industry explore through on a daily basis (when exactly this became an “industry” rather than a noble trade, is long forgotten), from tracking down every possible dollar of reimbursement to helping design defensible documentation for medical services, takes on increased importance. None of us should gain any joy from knowing that our doctor is up in the middle of the night not solving the problems of a sick patient, but rather contemplating their financial future.

If you’ve been in this industry for any length of time, you become desensitized to the annual rite of Congress reversing a well-publicized physician payment cut. It is analogous to a long-term hostage-taking, where after a while being chained to an oil heater in a basement, being beaten and tortured and living on bread and water becomes a new standard by which to measure “normal”. If no one else is going to stand up and say it, I will. This latest deadline to end all deadlines isn’t business as usual, and it’s not something we should just get used to and coexist alongside, awaiting the usual temporary solution. It’s sick, it’s depraved and it has to stop.