<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Health Care Overhaul, Part II: Effects on Providers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fimed.com/blog/2010/04/02/health-care-overhaul-part-ii-effects-on-providers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fimed.com/blog/2010/04/02/health-care-overhaul-part-ii-effects-on-providers/</link>
	<description>The Pulse of Your Practice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:22:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fi-Med Management, Inc</title>
		<link>http://www.fimed.com/blog/2010/04/02/health-care-overhaul-part-ii-effects-on-providers/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Fi-Med Management, Inc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fimed.com/?p=1094#comment-296</guid>
		<description>[...] Health Care Overhaul, Part II: Effects on Providers  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Health Care Overhaul, Part II: Effects on Providers  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Malkowski</title>
		<link>http://www.fimed.com/blog/2010/04/02/health-care-overhaul-part-ii-effects-on-providers/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Malkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fimed.com/?p=1094#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Paul - great post and very informative.  I had not yet heard about the new enrollment and re-validation efforts being put in place.  I have worked with other providers in the state of Florida in the past, and their Medicaid program requires new enrollees to go through an extensive fingerprinting/background check that adds cost to the application process.  While I understand the benefit of doing this, I will be crossing my fingers in hopes that CMS does not implement this time-consuming, costly process for all of their new/existing providers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul &#8211; great post and very informative.  I had not yet heard about the new enrollment and re-validation efforts being put in place.  I have worked with other providers in the state of Florida in the past, and their Medicaid program requires new enrollees to go through an extensive fingerprinting/background check that adds cost to the application process.  While I understand the benefit of doing this, I will be crossing my fingers in hopes that CMS does not implement this time-consuming, costly process for all of their new/existing providers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.fimed.com/blog/2010/04/02/health-care-overhaul-part-ii-effects-on-providers/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 20:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fimed.com/?p=1094#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Great post. You always do a wonderful job of sorting all this out in a way that everyone can understand. BTW-LOVE the Brian Wilson link!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. You always do a wonderful job of sorting all this out in a way that everyone can understand. BTW-LOVE the Brian Wilson link!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

